|
Hammond@zk3.dec.com Archives
| |
|
These are the archives from Mark Longo's original Hammond List, 1994-97
| ||
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: Best horn driver for 145?
"TP" == Todd A Phipps <b3nut@madison.tdsnet.com> writes: TP> Hi - I have a couple 145's and a 21H, and I was wondering what TP> the best 16 ohm horn driver was for them. I play in a rock TP> context and would like a nice sing when backing off the volume TP> and a good bark when I light the afterburner.. ;-) There are (at least) three 16-ohm drivers that are used. I believe all give a brighter sound than than the original Jensen. Two require 1-3/8" adapter plates and one uses the stock mount. Stock mount - available from fine Leslie parts and service dealers everywhere - bolts to the original adapter plate with slight modification. I think this one is what's in the current production 122 cabinet. Is said to be 60W - no one has reported a failure on this list yet. Cost about $130 to $150. EV-1829 - This is a 60W driver and is the one referred to in "Unearthing the Mysteries of the Leslie Cabinet", April 1981, pp130-143, by Clifford Hendricksen, Recording-Engineer/Producer magazine. (Everyone should read this article if possible.) It's been around quite a while, is manufactured by University (EV now). It is said in that article to sound quite close to stock and is able to withstand significantly higher power than the stock amplifier provides. $130 or so - requires adapter plate. Atlas PD-60 - Also 60W and is used often for this application. How much brighter than stock is it? How much does it cost? It requires an adapter plate. I use the stock bolt-on replacement. It is a bit bright though not objectionably so, and I am quite happy with it actually. I have not compared it to a stock driver because, alas, all the ones in my Leslies were blown when I got them. TP> Also, are there any replacement woofers that could give my 145 a TP> bit more bottom? Be careful here. The bottom end of a Leslie is very much dependent upon the characteristics of that driver. The no-feedback-from- secondary of the 122 and the series feedback of the 145 amplifier cause the output impedance of those amplifers to be high at low-frequencies. The resultant damping factor allows the speaker's resonant point to provide accentuated bass response. A speaker with a lower Qts, or a f0 at some other frequency, will change the sound of the bottom end quite a bit. The FAQ says JBL models E-140, K-140 have been recommended. The E-140 has a Qts of .17, the K-140's is .21. These are very low and are typical of loudspeakers whose suspension assemblies are stiff enough to allow them handle 200W without turning into powder. I'm skeptical about these drivers working well but - hey, it's just my opinion. (plus they're 8-ohm anyway). (and on another, but related, topic...) The technique of adjusting feedback to adjust the bass response was used back in the good old days of tube amplifier "hi-fidelity", back before Thiele and others developed the electrical analog for loudspeaker analysis and synthesis. Langford-Smith mentions somewhere in his book (1950s) about too low of an output impedance hurting the bass response, and he mentions some optimum numbers for damping factor for flat bass response. Solid-state amps look like voltage sources at low freqs, very low output Z. That's why when I replaced the Leslie's tube amplifier with a higher power, but solid-state amplifier, the bass response wasn't as good. Also, the so-called synthetic bass was greatly reduced, really hurting the sound of left-hand bass. The frequency response could be fixed by equalization. I could get all the bass response I wanted and more. But the solid-state amp was too linear to effectively create the synthetic bass tones. No amount of EQ will help in this case. This is really an important characteristic of the Leslie tube amp and driver combination and shouldn't be overlooked IMHO. I really wish we had the Thiele-Small parameters for the stock woofer. This would be quite useful for comparison purposes. Also, as long as we're wishing and hoping, a listening test with data comparing Jensen, Atlas, EV-1829 and the bolt-on stock replacement treble drivers would be nice. Oh yes, while you're at it, a curve of the complex output impedance of the 122 Leslie amplifier would be useful too. Seriously though, if someone could provide a comparison of the treble drivers, or perhaps setup a test... (Tony?) -- brad baker bpb@cca.rockwell.com
|