|
Hammond@zk3.dec.com Archives
| |
|
These are the archives from Mark Longo's original Hammond List, 1994-97
| ||
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] A-100 & A-102 Best Sound/Value Consoles
All of my A-100 & A-102 consoles have the spring type reverb. They vary in age from s/n 20636 to a black-transformer s/n 32578 (which looks awful, but is the best-playing Hammond I own). I recently sold an A-100 s/n ~79xx, which was my oldest. I think the best sound/value can be gotten from the A-100 & A-102 today. Regards, George Fish Jr. GeoFishJr@aol.com <---- preferred private email address In a message dated 97-02-03 14:23:47 EST, you write: > > >I've been looking for an A100 for approx 6 months, and during that time I' > ve > > >seen many of them. I've noticed several model variations including lace > > >reverb v. spring reverb > > > Personally, I don't think the necklace reverb works well in an A-100 - > They > > tend to be too sensitive to motion. That aside, I'd go for the OLDEST A- > 100 > > you can find. Build quality is excellent. The later manual chassis with > > round gold plated or square bussrods were not on a par with older > specimens. > > I will concur with Bob on this one. Unless you have a concrete slab > for the A100, you will experience crash noises from the necklace. It's > just too sensitive. Replacement of the necklace with a later stretch > spring type shouldn't be a problem, if the coil impedances match. I > intend to do this with mine. > Dan Kerl > dlkerl@ro.com >
|